The loss of a relationship can be a very stressful situation. As human beings, we seem to have a inherent need to belong, to be able to identify ourselves as part of a larger group. Losing that identity can be a painful and trying experience. Some research has noted that the loss of group identity can be as disruptive as the death of a loved one.

As the circumstances of my relationship with the LDS Church changed, I felt a need to answer the question: Do I still consider myself a Mormon? Yes, but my definition of Mormon has changed. What do I answer when I am asked of my religion?

For a number of years, I responded that I considered myself a ‘unaffiliated Christian restorationist.’ This seemed to fit as I did not formally belong to any religious entity. I held myself as a follower of Christ, but a special version that believed in a restoration subsequent to the sojourn of the Savior. That restoration was accomplished through Joseph Smith and is embodied in the Book of Mormon and other latter day scriptures. In some ways that phrase was not sufficient in description. It lacked to linkage to the faith of my youth that I felt was still important to recognize.

I decided to look for an alternative and had, for some period, chosen ‘free-range Mormon.’ This had its descriptive value also. Free-range signified that I chose to nourish my spirit on the natural (pure) and unadulterated milk and meat of the scriptures rather than the processed (correlated) foods found in the lesson plans of the church. It meant that I sought knowledge from the original source through direct revelation rather than relying on material being filtered and manipulated by others. This name also noted the heritage within Mormonism reaching back for multiple generations.

This presented the larger question, for those who find themselves in this situation, by what name should we be called. As I pondered this question, my mind was taken back to the statement by King Benjamin:

And it shall come to pass that whosoever doeth this shall be found at the right hand of God, for he shall know the name by which he is called; for he shall be called by the name of Christ. (Mosiah 5:9)

In this statement, King Benjamin was addressing the people who had listened to his sermon found in the early chapters of Mosiah. They had humbled themselves and were blessed by the Spirit, receiving great joy and a remission of their sins. It was this experience that ‘wrought a mighty change in us, or in our hearts, that we have no more disposition to do evil, but to do good continually.’ (Mosiah 5:2)

What was the thing that the people did to qualify for being called ‘by the name of Christ?’ The answer, as I understand it, is that they agreed to enter into a covenant as described in these verse of chapter 5

4  And it is the faith which we have had on the things which our king has spoken unto us that has brought us to this great knowledge, whereby we do rejoice with such exceedingly great joy.

5  And we are willing to enter into a covenant with our God to do his will, and to be obedient to his commandments in all things that he shall command us, all the remainder of our days, that we may not bring upon ourselves a never-ending torment, as has been spoken by the angel, that we may not drink out of the cup of the wrath of God.

It was the fact that they were willing to covenant with God. Their part of the covenant was that they would do His will and be obedient to His commandments for the rest of their lives. In return for this lifelong obedience, these people were to be called the ‘children of Christ’

7  And now, because of the covenant which ye have made ye shall be called the children of Christ, his sons, and his daughters; for behold, this day he hath spiritually begotten you; for ye say that your hearts are changed through faith on his name; therefore, ye are born of him and have become his sons and his daughters.

8  And under this head ye are made free, and there is no other head whereby ye can be made free.  There is no other name given whereby salvation cometh; therefore, I would that ye should take upon you the name of Christ, all you that have entered into the covenant with God that ye should be obedient unto the end of your lives.

The people of King Benjamin were to be called the sons and daughters of Christ having been spiritually born of Him. Their hearts were changed and they were charged with being obedient to God as they endured to the end through the covenant.

They were to also recognize that there is ‘no other head whereby ye can be made free.’ No man or organization is capable of making them, and us, free, it is only through Christ. There is no other name that can deliver on salvation. We, too, are charged with taking upon us the name of Christ, we are charged to make the same covenant that was found among the people of King Benjamin.

We, by doing so, can be called the sons and daughters of Christ. It requires of us great humility which prepares us to receive His Spirit; that Spirit which brings great joy and a remission of our sins. We then, given the change of heart, are ready to covenant with Him to be obedient to only Christ for the remainder of our lives.

What think ye?

2 Responses to “Labels”

  • JT:

    While reading your post, I had an almost wholly unrelated thought, and I wanted to thank you for having helped inspire it. The scriptures tell us of experiences like King Benjamin’s subjects had, whereby they’re suddenly and dramatically changed. All my life I’ve been told that it doesn’t necessarily work that way for everyone, that it’s much more common for this conversion to happen gradually. But what if that’s not actually true? Certainly I’ve noticed over the years that some of the temptations I had as years ago have disappeared, but I’m not convinced there’s no similarly quick and dramatic conversion available for me, if I take the right path to find it.

    • Spektator:

      JT,
      Thanks for stopping by. From all my research in the scriptures, I have found multiple examples of the ‘quick and dramatic conversion’ such as Alma the younger and the people of King Benjamin. You can also find that those who were ‘in the church’ such as Enos were granted a remission of their sins which I hold to be the same baptism of fire.

      I have not found sufficient evidence in the scriptures that the conversion can happen gradually over time. As such I would encourage everyone to at least try to receive the baptism of fire and the remission of sins in the same way as the people of King Benjamin. As I understand, it requires humility and crying unto the Lord. Two things that must be taken much deeper than what is traditionally taught in church.

      Spek